CtEDO 24.11.2020 Auto

CASE OF ȘIK v. TURKEY (No. 2) - [Turkish Translation] summary by Benan Molu, Rumeysa Budak, Emre Karaman and İdil Özcan

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
24.11.2020
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Petition;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom to impart ideas;Freedom to impart information);No violation of Article 18+5-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion;Article 5 - Right to liberty and security);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF ȘIK v. TURKEY (No. 2) - [Turkish Translation] summary by Benan Molu, Rumeysa Budak, Emre Karaman and İdil Özcan (CtEDO, 2020)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs;Obiecția preliminară respinsă (art. 34) Aplicații individuale;(Art. 34) Cerere;Violare a articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - Arestarea legală sau detenție;art. 5-1-c - Suspiciuni rezonabile);Violare a articolului 10 - Libertatea de expresie-{general} (art. 10-1 - Libertatea de a imparti idei; Libertatea de a transmite informații);Nici o încălcare a articolului 18+5-1 - Limitarea utilizării restricțiilor drepturilor (art. 18 - Restricții neautorizate) (art. 5-1 - Arestarea legală sau deținerea legală;art. 5-1-C - Suspectul rezonabil;art. 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate);Nici o încălcare a articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-4 - Precizie de revizuire); Daune morală (art. 41 - Daune morală;Darticolul)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2020-11-24
0,99
CASE OF ȘIK v. TURKEY (N° 2) - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Petition;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and
CtEDO 2020-11-24
0,99
CASE OF ȘIK v. TURKEY (No. 2)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Petition;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty a
CtEDO 2020-11-10
0,96
CASE OF SABUNCU AND OTHERS v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by Benan Molu, Rumeysa Budak, Emre Karaman and İdil Özcan
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already submitted to another international procedure;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application;Prelimin
CtEDO 2020-12-22
0,96
Selahattin Demirtaș v. Turkey (no. 2) [GC]
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already submitted to another international procedure;Preliminary object
CtEDO 2020-12-22
0,96
CASE OF SELAHATTİN DEMİRTAȘ v. TURKEY (No. 2)
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already submitted to another international procedure;Preliminary object
Sursă