CtEDO 24.11.2020 Auto

CASE OF ȘIK v. TURKEY (No. 2)

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
24.11.2020
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Petition;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom to impart ideas;Freedom to impart information);No violation of Article 18+5-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion;Article 5 - Right to liberty and security);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
CASE OF ȘIK v. TURKEY (No. 2) (CtEDO, 2020)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs;Obiecția preliminară respinsă (art. 34) Aplicații individuale;(Art. 34) Petiţie;Nici o încălcare a art. 5 - Dreptul la libertate şi securitate (art. 5-4 - Viteza de revizuire);Viteză a art. 5 - Dreptul la libertate şi securitate (arestarea sau detenţia legală;art. 5-1-c - Suspecte rezonabile);Vitezare a art. 10 - Libertatea de exprimare-{general} (art. 10-1 - Libertatea de impartire a ideilor; Libertatea de transmitere a informaţiilor);Nici o încălcare a art. 18+5-1 - Limitare a utilizării restricţiilor drepturilor (art. 18 - Restricţii în scopuri neautorizate) (art. 5-1 - Arestarea sau detenţie legală;art. 5-1-c - Suspectarea rezonabilă;art. 5 - Dăunul la libertate şi securitate); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Daune nepecunială)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2020-11-24
1,00
CASE OF ȘIK v. TURKEY (N° 2) - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Petition;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and
CtEDO 2020-11-24
0,99
CASE OF ȘIK v. TURKEY (No. 2) - [Turkish Translation] summary by Benan Molu, Rumeysa Budak, Emre Karaman and İdil Özcan
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Petition;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and
CtEDO 2020-12-22
0,96
CASE OF SELAHATTİN DEMİRTAȘ v. TURKEY (No. 2)
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already submitted to another international procedure;Preliminary object
CtEDO 2020-12-22
0,96
Selahattin Demirtaș v. Turkey (no. 2) [GC]
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already submitted to another international procedure;Preliminary object
CtEDO 2021-01-19
0,96
CASE OF ATILLA TAȘ v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to libe
Sursă