Decision on a request for an advisory opinion under Protocol No. 16 concerning the interpretation of Articles 2, 3 and 6 of the Convention

RESPONDENT

SVK

HOTĂRÂRE

14.12.2020

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Decision on a request for an advisory opinion under Protocol No. 16 concerning the interpretation of Articles 2, 3 and 6 of the Convention (CtEDO, 2020)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2016-11-03

0,88

JARKOVSKÝ v. SLOVAKIA

Convention that he has not had an effective remedy at his disposal in relation to the violations alleged above. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1. In view of the alleged inconsistency in decisions made concerning the same issue, did the applicant

CtEDO 2000-01-11

0,88

POLOVKA v. SLOVAKIA

, unanimously, DECIDES TO ADJOURN the examination of the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of the proceedings. DECLARES INADMISSIBLE the remainder of the application. Erik Fribergh Marc Fischbach R

CtEDO 2023-07-10

0,88

BADO v. SLOVAKIA

3 of Protocol No. 4, in view of the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to protect the population’s health? What is the State’s margin of appreciation in this context? Have the authorities envisaged or considered any less severe measures in the

CtEDO 2021-01-29

0,88

ŠEKS v. CROATIA

that interference prescribed by law and necessary in terms of Article 10 § 2 (cf. Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, 8 November 2016)? 2. Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of his civil rights a

CtEDO 2018-03-15

0,88

CASE OF PSMA, SPOL. S.R.O. AGAINST SLOVAKIA

Noting that the general measures concerning the execution of this case are being examined in the context of the DRAFT-OVA A.S. group of cases and that the closure of this case in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general me

Sursă