CtEDO 09.03.2021 Auto

CASE OF EMINAĞAOĞLU v. TURKEY - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
09.03.2021
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Tribunal established by law);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF EMINAĞAOĞLU v. TURKEY - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine (CtEDO, 2021)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Pronunțat nefondat;Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedura civilă;art. 6-1 - Accesul la instanță;Tribunal instituit prin lege);Încălcarea articoluluiui 10 - Libertatea de expresie-{general} (art. 10-1 - Libertatea de expresie);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de respectare a vieții private și de familie (art. 8-1 - Respectultatea vieții private);Prejudiciu material - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Sărbătorire pecuniare); Prejudiciu moral - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Să satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-03-09
0,99
CASE OF EMINAĞAOĞLU v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Tribunal established by law);Violation
CtEDO 2021-03-09
0,98
CASE OF EMİNAĞAOĞLU v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Tribunal established by law);Violation
CtEDO 2021-02-09
0,96
CASE OF N.Ç. v. TURKEY - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Ar
CtEDO 2025-07-17
0,96
CASE OF OPALENKO v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Ar
CtEDO 2021-07-20
0,96
CASE OF AKGÜN v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of
Sursă