CtEDO 29.06.2021 Auto

CASE OF TERCAN v. TURKEY

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
29.06.2021
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Trial within a reasonable time);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
CASE OF TERCAN v. TURKEY (CtEDO, 2021)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Pronunțat nedrept;Violare a art. 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (arestarea sau detenția legală;Procedură prevăzută prin lege);Violare a art. 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (arestarea sau detenția legală;art. 5-1-c - Suspiciune rezonabilă);Violare a art. 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-3 - judecată într-un timp rezonabil);Violare a art. 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și de familie (art. 8-1 - Respectarea casei);Distrugerea pecuniară - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material; Just satisfacție); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-06-29
1,00
CASE OF TERCAN v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article
CtEDO 2021-07-20
0,98
CASE OF AKGÜN v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of
CtEDO 2021-07-20
0,97
CASE OF AKGÜN v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of
CtEDO 2021-07-20
0,97
Akgün v. Turkey
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of
CtEDO 2020-03-03
0,97
CASE OF BAȘ v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Procedure prescribed by law);Viol
Sursă