CtEDO 16.09.2021 Auto

CASE OF X v. POLAND - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

RESPONDENT
POL
HOTĂRÂRE
16.09.2021
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8-2 - Necessary in a democratic society;Protection of the rights and freedoms of others;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF X v. POLAND - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM) (CtEDO, 2021)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Perioada de șase luni;Rezistare inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Perioada de șase luni;Încălcarea articoluluiui 14+8 - Interzicerea discriminării (art. 14 - Discriminare) (art. 8-2 - Necesar într-o societate democratică;Protegerea drepturilor și libertăților altor persoane;art. 8-1 - Respectul vieții familiale;art. 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și de familie); Prejudiciu material - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Dumnarea morală);Dumnarea morală (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dumnarea)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-09-16
0,99
CASE OF X v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Ar
CtEDO 2021-09-16
0,99
CASE OF X v. POLAND - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Ar
CtEDO 2021-09-16
0,99
CASE OF X v. POLAND
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Ar
CtEDO 2021-09-16
0,98
CASE OF X v. POLAND - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Ar
CtEDO 2022-02-17
0,96
CASE OF Y v. POLAND - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;No violation of Article 8 - Right to
Sursă