CtEDO 04.11.2021 RO

Decision Dragnea v. Romania - complaint about enforcement of a sentence where two of the judges’ signatures were missing from the finalised judgment due to their retirement

HOTĂRÂRE

04.11.2021

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Decision Dragnea v. Romania - complaint about enforcement of a sentence where two of the judges’ signatures were missing from the finalised judgment due to their retirement (CtEDO, 2021)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2022-06-10

0,88

CASE OF GEORGESCU AND OTHERS AGAINST ROMANIA AND 1 OTHER CASE

Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)131 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Two cases against Romania (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 10 June 2022 at the 1436 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Application No

CtEDO 2025-11-07

0,88

CASE OF E.S. AGAINST ROMANIA AND BULGARIA

to give effect to the judgment, and noting that no award of just satisfaction was made by the Court in the present case (see document DH-DD(2025)239 ); Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have

CtEDO 2022-12-01

0,88

CASE OF PĂDURARIU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

s list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 of the Convention and the judgment of 13 January 2022 in the case of Pădurariu and Others v. Romania should be revised as far as it concerns the application in question. FOR THESE REASONS, T

CtEDO 2022-09-22

0,88

CASE OF MARINA AGAINST ROMANIA

Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)218 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Marina against Romania (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 22 September 2022 at the 1443 rd meeting of the Ministers' Deputies) Application N

CtEDO 2023-06-07

0,88

CASE OF E.S. AGAINST ROMANIA AND BULGARIA

was made by the Court in this case (see document DH-DD(2017)591 ); Considering that no individual measure was required in relation to the custody proceedings before the Romanian courts, since these had been completed by the time the Court’s

Sursă