CtEDO 23.11.2021 Auto

CASE OF KOOPERATIV NEPTUN SERVIS v. RUSSIA - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
23.11.2021
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF KOOPERATIV NEPTUN SERVIS v. RUSSIA - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine (CtEDO, 2021)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Pronunțat nefondat;Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedura civilă;art. 6-1 - Accesul la instanță);Încălcarea articoluluiui 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecția proprietăților (art. 1 alin. 2 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Controlul utilizării proprietăților);Leziuni pecuniare - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Leziuni pecuniare;Să satisfacem);Leziuni pecuniare - atribuire (art. 41 - Leziuni morale;Să satisfacem)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-11-23
0,98
CASE OF KOOPERATIV NEPTUN SERVIS v. RUSSIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.
CtEDO 2025-07-17
0,95
CASE OF OPALENKO v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Ar
CtEDO 2021-03-09
0,95
CASE OF EMINAĞAOĞLU v. TURKEY - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Tribunal established by law);Violation
CtEDO 2025-07-17
0,95
CASE OF OPALENKO v. UKRAINE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Ar
CtEDO 2025-10-16
0,95
CASE OF M.S.L., TOV v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property);Violation
Sursă