CtEDO
05.04.2022
Auto
CASE OF BENKHARBOUCHE AND JANAH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine
RESPONDENT
GBR
HOTĂRÂRE
05.04.2022
Pe scurt
- Instanță
- CtEDO
- Concluzie
- Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 14+6-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 6-1 - Access to court;Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Right to a fair trial);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BENKHARBOUCHE AND JANAH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine (CtEDO, 2022)
Obiecție preliminară respinsă (art. 37) Strângerea cererilor-{general}; (Art. 37-1) Provocarea cererilor;Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procesul civil;art. 6-1 - Accesul la instanță);Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procesul civil;art. 6-1 - Accesul la instanță);Încălcarea articoluluiui 14+6-1 - Interzicerea discriminării (art. 14 - Discriminare) (art. 6 - Accesul la instanță;art. 6 - Procesul civil;Dreapta la un proces echitabil);Darul pecuniar - atribuirea (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Satisfacție echitabilă);Dar prejudiciul moral (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Darticolul)
§ Cauze similare
5 cauze