CtEDO 05.04.2022 Auto

CASE OF BENKHARBOUCHE AND JANAH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine

RESPONDENT
GBR
HOTĂRÂRE
05.04.2022
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 14+6-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 6-1 - Access to court;Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Right to a fair trial);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BENKHARBOUCHE AND JANAH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine (CtEDO, 2022)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respinsă (art. 37) Strângerea cererilor-{general}; (Art. 37-1) Provocarea cererilor;Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procesul civil;art. 6-1 - Accesul la instanță);Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procesul civil;art. 6-1 - Accesul la instanță);Încălcarea articoluluiui 14+6-1 - Interzicerea discriminării (art. 14 - Discriminare) (art. 6 - Accesul la instanță;art. 6 - Procesul civil;Dreapta la un proces echitabil);Darul pecuniar - atribuirea (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Satisfacție echitabilă);Dar prejudiciul moral (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Darticolul)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-04-05
0,98
CASE OF BENKHARBOUCHE AND JANAH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Ar
CtEDO 2022-04-05
0,97
Benkharbouche and Janah v. the United Kingdom
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Ar
CtEDO 2021-05-11
0,92
CASE OF YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. BULGARIA - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-1) Final domestic decision;Violation of
CtEDO 2021-07-22
0,92
CASE OF GUMENYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fa
CtEDO 2018-11-06
0,92
CASE OF BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation
Sursă