ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 08.04.2022 RO

Advisory opinion on the assessment, under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, of the proportionality of a general prohibition on standing for election after removal from office in impeachment proceedings - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

RESPONDENT
LTU
HOTĂRÂRE
08.04.2022
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Advisory opinion on the assessment, under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, of the proportionality of a general prohibition on standing for election after removal from office in impeachment proceedings - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM) (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-07-06
0,88
CASE OF TULEYA v. POLAND - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-
CtEDO 2020-05-28
0,88
CASE OF EVERS v. GERMANY - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair
CtEDO 2023-12-19
0,88
CASE OF MATKAVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case -
CtEDO 2022-09-22
0,88
CASE OF PAKSAS AGAINST LITHUANIA
ed in order to give effect to the judgment, and noting that no award of just satisfaction was made by the Court in the present case (see document DH-DD(2022)688 ); Taking note of the various efforts undertaken by the authorities, in particu
CtEDO 2021-01-21
0,88
CASE OF SHMORGUNOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded
Sursă