CtEDO
21.07.2022
Auto
CASE OF BIELIŃSKI v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice
RESPONDENT
POL
HOTĂRÂRE
21.07.2022
Pe scurt
- Instanță
- CtEDO
- Concluzie
- Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13+6 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Right to a fair trial;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BIELIŃSKI v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice (CtEDO, 2022)
Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Pronunțat nefondat;Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedură civilă;art. 6-1 - Timp rezonabil);Încălcarea articoluluiui 13+6 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 6 - Procedură civilă;Dreapta la un proces echitabil;art. 6-1 - Timp rezonabil);Prejudiciu material - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Darcurea morală - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)
§ Cauze similare
5 cauze