CtEDO 09.10.2025 Auto

CASE OF PLATON v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

RESPONDENT
MDA
HOTĂRÂRE
09.10.2025
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF PLATON v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (CtEDO, 2025)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Pronunțarea articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant;Tratament inhuman) (aspectul susținut);Încălcarea articolului 13+3 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 3 - Interzicerea torturii;Degradarea tratamentului inhuman);Încălcarea articolului 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8-1 - Respectul pentru viața familială); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Darcarea)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-07-18
0,95
CASE OF D.H. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3
CtEDO 2022-09-13
0,95
CASE OF GILANOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonably necessary to prevent
CtEDO 2022-09-13
0,95
Gilanov v. the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonably necessary to prevent
CtEDO 2022-11-22
0,95
CASE OF G.M. AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Viol
CtEDO 2019-03-12
0,95
CASE OF PETUKHOV v. UKRAINE (No. 2) - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - P
Sursă