CtEDO 06.10.2022 Auto

Juszczyszyn v. Poland

RESPONDENT
POL
HOTĂRÂRE
06.10.2022
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal;Tribunal established by law);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 18+8 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life;Article 8-2 - Necessary in a democratic society;Protection of the rights and freedoms of others);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Juszczyszyn v. Poland (CtEDO, 2022)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs; menţinerea inadmisibilă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedură disciplinară;art. 6-1 - Tribunalul Imparial;Tribunal independent;Tribunal instituit prin lege);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8-1 - Respectul pentru viața privată);Încălcarea articoluluiui 18+8 - Limitarea utilizării restricțiilor drepturilor (art. 18 - Restricții pentru scopuri neautorizate) (art. 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și a vieții familiale;art. 8-1 - Respectul pentru viața privată;art. 8 - Necesar pentru o societate democratică;Protejarea drepturilor și libertăților altorați);Duministrul pecuniar - respingere (art. 41 - Daune pecuniar;Ducturare moral)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-10-06
1,00
CASE OF JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair tri
CtEDO 2022-10-06
0,99
CASE OF JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair tri
CtEDO 2022-10-06
0,99
CASE OF JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND - [Turkish Translation] by Kadir Öztürk
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair tri
CtEDO 2023-11-23
0,97
CASE OF WAŁĘSA v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Imparti
CtEDO 2023-11-23
0,97
Wałęsa v. Poland
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Imparti
Sursă