CtEDO 08.11.2022 Auto

CASE OF VĂLEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
08.11.2022
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1-b) Matter resolved;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures);Pecuniary damage - reserved (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF VĂLEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania (CtEDO, 2022)
HUDOC · oficial

Ieșiți din listă (Art. 37) Strângerea cererilor-{general}; (Art. 37-1-b) Chestiune rezolvată;Rezistare inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifest nefondat;Încălcarea articoluluiui 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecția proprietăților (art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Disfrutarea pacifică a poseselor; Statul pârât să ia măsuri de caracter general (art. 46-2 - Măsuri generale);Dăune pecuniare - rezervate (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Dar satisfacție);Dăune morale - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-11-08
1,00
CASE OF VĂLEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1-b) Matter resolved;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Prote
CtEDO 2022-11-08
0,99
Văleanu and Others v. Romania
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1-b) Matter resolved;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Prote
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,94
CASE OF ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,94
CASE OF ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,94
CASE OF ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
Sursă