CtEDO 06.12.2022 Auto

Subașı v. Türkiye

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
06.12.2022
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
Subașı v. Türkiye (CtEDO, 2022)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-b) Nu există dezavantaj semnificativ;Rezistare inadmisibilă (Art. 34) Aplicații individuale;(Art. 34) Victima;Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și de familie (art. 8 - Obligații pozitive;art. 8-1 - Respectul vieții de familie);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și de familie (art. 8 - Obligații pozitive;art. 8-1 - Respectul corespondenței;Aspectul vieții de familie;Aspectul vieții de familie);Afectarea morală - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție);Afectarea pecuniară - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-12-06
0,99
CASE OF SUBAȘI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family lif
CtEDO 2022-12-06
0,98
CASE OF SUBAȘI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family lif
CtEDO 2022-12-06
0,98
CASE OF SUBAȘI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE - [Turkish Translation] summary by Kadir Öztürk
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family lif
CtEDO 2022-12-06
0,98
CASE OF SUBAȘI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family lif
CtEDO 2021-03-09
0,95
CASE OF EMİNAĞAOĞLU v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Tribunal established by law);Violation
Sursă