CtEDO 06.07.2023 Auto

CASE OF TULEYA v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice

RESPONDENT
POL
HOTĂRÂRE
06.07.2023
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal;Tribunal established by law);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2023
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF TULEYA v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice (CtEDO, 2023)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară permisă (art. 34) Aplicații individuale;(Art. 34) Victime;Obiecții preliminare respinse (art. 34) Aplicații individuale;(Art. 34) Victime;Obiecții preliminare respinse (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs; (art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Rezistare inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Rationne personae;Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedură penală;art. 6-1 - Tribunalul Imparial;Tribunal independent instituit prin lege);Violația articolului 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8-1 - Respectul vieții private);Încălcarea articoluluiui 10 - Libertatea de exprimare - {general} (art. 10-1 - Libertatea de exprimare);Daune colective - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Dar satisfacție); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-07-06
1,00
CASE OF TULEYA v. POLAND
Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-
CtEDO 2023-07-06
0,99
CASE OF TULEYA v. POLAND - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-
CtEDO 2023-11-23
0,97
CASE OF WAŁĘSA v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Imparti
CtEDO 2022-10-06
0,97
CASE OF JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair tri
CtEDO 2022-10-06
0,97
CASE OF JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair tri
Sursă