CtEDO 13.07.2023 RO

Decision Chennouf and Others v. France - Application lodged by family of Chief Corporal A.C. murdered by Mohamed Merah in Montauban in 2012 declared inadmissible

HOTĂRÂRE

13.07.2023

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2023
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Decision Chennouf and Others v. France - Application lodged by family of Chief Corporal A.C. murdered by Mohamed Merah in Montauban in 2012 declared inadmissible (CtEDO, 2023)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2021-12-13

0,87

CHENNOUF ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

Publié le 10 janvier 2022 CINQUIÈME SECTION Requête n o 4704/19 Katia CHENNOUF et autres contre la France introduite le 16 janvier 2019 communiquée le 13 décembre 2021 OBJET DE L’AFFAIRE Les requérants sont les parents, la veuve et le fils

CtEDO 2024-04-18

0,86

CASE OF LEROY AND OTHERS v. FRANCE - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment)

CtEDO 2012-03-08

0,86

CASE OF ACHOUR AND OTHER CASES AGAINST FRANCE

Resolution CM/ResDH(2012)24 [1] Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights 7 cases against France Case, Application No. Date of decision Achour, application No. 22276/09 22/03/2011 Association de Défense des Actionnair

CtEDO 2018-04-04

0,86

CASE OF A.M. AND OTHERS AGAINST FRANCE

Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)122 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights A.M. and Others against France (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 4 April 2018 at the 1312 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Applicatio

CtEDO 2022-11-24

0,85

KHALIFA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

applicant with sufficient safeguards against the alleged bias of the expert and her report, as well as against the alleged unlawfulness of the evidence obtained. 23. Given the above-noted considerations, the Court finds that the application

Sursă