CtEDO 13.07.2023 Auto

CASE OF EMIN HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2)

RESPONDENT
AZE
HOTĂRÂRE
13.07.2023
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application);No violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Examination of the case;Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2023
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF EMIN HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2) (CtEDO, 2023)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs;Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și a familiei (art. 8-1 - Respectul vieții private);Nici o încălcare a articolului 34 - Aplicații individuale (art. 34 - Incalcarea exercitării dreptului la cerere);Nici o încălcare a articolului 38 - Examinarea cazului - {general} (art. 38 - Examinarea cazului;Obligarea de a furniza toate facilitățile necesare);Prejudiciu material - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Dar satisfacție); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-07-13
0,99
Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan (No. 2)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Arti
CtEDO 2023-07-13
0,98
CASE OF EMIN HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2) - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Arti
CtEDO 2020-05-28
0,95
CASE OF FARZALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a f
CtEDO 2023-10-05
0,95
CASE OF GHAZARYAN AND BAYRAMYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and secur
CtEDO 2020-05-28
0,95
Farzaliyev v. Azerbaijan
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a f
Sursă