CtEDO 26.02.2026 RO

Decision Macovei v. Romania - Sanctions imposed on presidential candidate under election law did not amount to a criminal charge

HOTĂRÂRE
26.02.2026
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2026
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
Decision Macovei v. Romania - Sanctions imposed on presidential candidate under election law did not amount to a criminal charge (CtEDO, 2026)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2020-05-26
0,88
CASE OF MAKUCHYAN AND MINASYAN v. AZERBAIJAN AND HUNGARY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) (Azerbaijan);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect) (Azerbaijan);No violation of Article 2 - Right to
CtEDO 2019-05-07
0,88
MACOVEI c. ROUMANIE
Communiquée le 7 mai 2019 QUATRIÈME SECTION Requête n o 58004/17 Monica Luisa MACOVEI contre la Roumanie introduite le 28 juillet 2017 OBJET DE L’AFFAIRE La requête concerne la condamnation de la requérante [1], candidate indépendante aux é
CtEDO 2020-05-28
0,88
CASE OF FARZALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a f
CtEDO 2018-02-27
0,87
CASE OF SINKOVA v. UKRAINE - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty
CtEDO 2021-11-23
0,87
ZAGREBELNII v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Takes note of the terms of the respondent Government’s declaration under Article 6 of the Convention and of the modalities for ensuring compliance with the undertak
Sursă