CtEDO 23.05.2024 RO

Decision Amar v. France - Court declares complaint inadmissible because Judicial Service Commission found no disciplinary offence by applicant

HOTĂRÂRE

23.05.2024

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Decision Amar v. France - Court declares complaint inadmissible because Judicial Service Commission found no disciplinary offence by applicant (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2015-11-26

0,89

CASE OF EBRAHIMIAN v. FRANCE

law to the Conseil d’État. In her submissions, she emphasised that the administrative court of appeal had deprived its judgment of any legal basis in that it had failed to specify the nature of the item of attire worn by her which had justi

CtEDO 2018-05-29

0,88

ÖZTEKİN v. TURKEY

the Court finds that the applicants’ complaints concerning the inadequacy of the judicial response in the aftermath of the incident are manifestly ill ‐ founded and must be declared inadmissible within the meaning of Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 o

CtEDO 2025-01-16

0,88

CASE OF A.C. v. FRANCE

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1

CtEDO 2024-04-18

0,88

CASE OF LEROY AND OTHERS v. FRANCE - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment)

CtEDO 2025-09-04

0,88

CASE OF E.A. AND ASSOCIATION EUROPÉENNE CONTRE LES VIOLENCES FAITES AUX FEMMES AU TRAVAIL v. FRANCE

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 8 - R

Sursă