CtEDO
14.03.2013
Auto
Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine
RESPONDENT
UKR
HOTĂRÂRE
14.03.2013
Pe scurt
- Instanță
- CtEDO
- Concluzie
- Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of petition);Non-pecuniary damage - award
Citează această cauză
Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine (CtEDO, 2013)
Restul inadmisibil;Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant;Tratament inhuman) (Aspect substantiv);Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (Aspect substantiv);Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (Aspect substantiv);Încălcarea articoluluiui 2 - Dreptul la viață (art. 2-1 - Viața) (Aspect substantiv);Încălcarea articoluluiui 2 - Dreptul la viață (art. 2 - Investigarea efectivă) (Aspect procedură);Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Prohibirea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament inhuman) (Aspect substanțial);Încălcarea articoluluiui 34 - Aplicații individuale (art. 34 - Inferentarea exercitării dreptului cererei);
§ Cauze similare
5 cauze